Pisco Sour
domingo, setiembre 18, 2005
 
Burnt Norton
I

Time present and time past
Are both perhaps present in time future,
And time future contained in time past.
If all time is eternally present
All time is unredeemable.
What might have been is an abstraction
Remaining a perpetual possibility
Only in a world of speculation.
What might have been and what has been
Point to one end, which is always present.
Footfalls echo in the memory
Down the passage which we did not take
Towards the door we never opened
Into the rose-garden. My words echo
Thus, in your mind.
But to what purpose
Disturbing the dust on a bowl of rose-leaves
I do not know.
Other echoes
Inhabit the garden. Shall we follow?
Quick, said the bird, find them, find them,
Round the corner. Through the first gate,
Into our first world, shall we follow
The deception of the thrush? Into our first world.
There they were, dignified, invisible,
Moving without pressure, over the dead leaves,
In the autumn heat, through the vibrant air,
And the bird called, in response to
The unheard music hidden in the shrubbery,
And the unseen eyebeam crossed, for the roses
Had the look of flowers that are looked at.
There they were as our guests, accepted and accepting.
So we moved, and they, in a formal pattern,
Along the empty alley, into the box circle,
To look down into the drained pool.
Dry the pool, dry concrete, brown edged,
And the pool was filled with water out of sunlight,
And the lotos rose, quietly, quietly,
The surface glittered out of heart of light,
And they were behind us, reflected in the pool.
Then a cloud passed, and the pool was empty.
Go, said the bird, for the leaves were full of children,
Hidden excitedly, containing laughter.
Go, go, go, said the bird: human kind
Cannot bear very much reality.
Time past and time future
What might have been and what has been
Point to one end, which is always present.


Comments:
Pensemos en el futuro. No hay que asustarse, pero quien esta asustado?

El “mundo sensible” esta representado en una variedad de sensaciones, que basicamente se determinan por grados (y particularidades propias) entre el placer supremo y el dolor supremo. Son las particularidades propias lo que hace interesantes esas “sensaciones“. Que es el tiempo sino la variacion permanente de sensaciones, que es la movilidad? Este es el asunto mas asombroso para la filosofia: el devenir. Y si podemos pensar en el devenir, podemos pensar en el destino. En efecto, no podemos negar que habra un manana, un lunes por la manana, un frio de madrugada, una cancion repetida. Y aun sabiendo eso, no podemos predecir que va a suceder, con quien te encontraras, que espectaculo se presentara a mis sentidos (particularmente interpretado). Pero suceden eventos, inutiles y divertidisimos. Todo el tiempo. En efecto, somos titeres de la carne y gracias a dios por eso. Pero “eso” no es interesante, lo unico interesante son la particularidades propias, etc, etc.

Aquello que lo conoce todo y no es conocido por nadie es el sujeto. Decimos que conocemos a las personas y es sin embargo innegable que todo es producto de nuestra fantasia.

Tu blog es en verdad amplio y algun dia lo leere. Pero, si, es verdad, no tiene sentido y lo tiene.
 
Publicar un comentario

Powered by Blogger